Jake Paul issues a counteroffer to Dana White and gets trashed in reply

Jake Paul and Dana White trading shots on twitter in 2022.

Dana White responds to Jake Paul’s counter offer for fighting in the UFC.

Previously, Jake Paul was challenged by Dana White for random test on him for cocaine for the next ten years and Dana would randomly test him for steroid for next two years.

In his recent tweet, Jake Paul laid down some terms to fight Jorge Masvidal under UFC contract.

Increase minimum fighter pay to $50k (it’s 12k currently)

Guarantee UFC fighters 50% of the UFC annual revenues ($1bn in 2021)

Provide long term health care to all fighters (you previously said brain damage is part of the gig… Imagine if the NFL said that). There are many UFC alums who have publicly said they are suffering from brain damage. 

Jake Paul

Seems like Jake Paul want’s to play mind games with the game Dana White. But, he was immediately countered by Dana.

In a video released on twitter Dana White said,“Jake you never responded to the challenge. You publicly stated that I use cocaine. I do not. So I told you ‘You can randomly cocaine test me for the next ten years’. I believe that you’re a cheater, and I believe that you use steroids. So I want to randomly steroid test you for the next two years. And that thing that you came out with today, nobody on earth thinks that you wrote that, you’re too stupid.”

Dana also slammed Jake Paul for calling out UFC fighters who can sell PPV for him, He also said that Jake can’t sale PPV anymore, His PPV numbers are going down.

You can’t sell pay-per-views. You don’t know, yeah, you’re calling out Jorge Masvidal because he’s a pay-per-view superstar. Nate Diaz, Conor McGregor, Mike Tyson, these are all superstars. You’re not. You can’t sell pay-per-views so you do whatever the hell you want to do. I’m ready to roll buddy. I don’t use cocaine. Do you use steroids? Let’s do this Jake.

What you guys think of Jake Paul’s and Dana White’s comments? Tell us in the comment box below.

  • Leave a Reply